Comparison of Mark Liles' Papers on School Choice
Cover Page
Comparison of Mark Liles' Papers on School Choice
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Date
Critical Evaluation of Contrasting Arguments on School Choice Policies
I believe that the argument presented in "School Choice—An Educational Custom Fit" by Mark Liles is stronger, as it presents a more comprehensive and nuanced view of the benefits and potential limitations of school choice initiatives.
One point that I find particularly effective in this paper is when the author states, "For decades the public school system has offered a one size fits all approach to educating our nation's children. As we approached the 21st century, the public school system began to show its age. More and more children began to fall behind in a rapidly changing environment marked by the introduction of personal computers and later the internet." (page 1, line 23–25). This point effectively highlights the limitations of the traditional public school system and demonstrates how it struggles to adapt to technological and educational changes.
On the other hand, in "School Choice—An Unwise Option" by Mark Liles, one point that I find particularly ineffective is when the author states, "School choice turns out to not only be a bad idea; it's also a violation of our constitution." (page 1, line 6–7). This claim is broad and unsupported, as it does not provide specific examples or evidence to justify the argument. As a result, it weakens the overall persuasiveness of the paper.