Ethical Dilemma
Cover Page and Academic Identification Details
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Ethical Dilemma
Application of Deontological Ethics as a Rule-Based Moral Framework
An alternative ethical theory to the virtue ethics discussed in the original paper is deontological ethics. The morality of actions is emphasized in deontological ethics, which is a normative ethical theory based on rules, duties, or obligations. Regardless of their consequences, deontologists hold the belief that certain actions are inherently right or wrong. Deontological ethics is also referred to as “duty ethics”.
Deontological ethics offers a distinct moral framework for decision-making, which is one of its primary strengths. Certain moral duties are argued by deontologists to be universal and applicable to all individuals, irrespective of their personal preferences or desires. Even if it would result in a positive outcome, lying, cheating, or stealing is wrong. Deontologists argue that these actions are inherently wrong because they violate moral principles.
Justification for Applying Duty Ethics to the Issue of Illegal Immigration
Deontologists would argue that crossing the border illegally is always wrong because it violates the law and undermines the social contract between individuals and the state, in the context of illegal immigration. According to deontologists, the moral obligation of individuals to abide by the law is more significant than their personal aspirations for a better life or economic prospects. Deontologists would argue that illegal immigrants, even if motivated by understandable and sympathetic reasons, should be punished for breaking the law.
Critical Evaluation of Ethical Framework Limitations and Areas for Improvement
The original paper's weakness lies in its inability to provide a solution for the ethical dilemma presented by illegal immigration. The usefulness of virtue ethics as a framework for understanding the issue is highlighted in the paper. Nevertheless, there are no suggestions or actions proposed. By contrast, duty ethics affords a precise and clear-cut answer to this problem: persons are obliged to follow the law, and any disobedience of it is consistently inappropriate. Although the root causes of illegal immigration may not be addressed by this approach, it does establish a definite moral yardstick for assessing both individual and state actions.