View Full Paper

Owner Consent Verified
Essay 5

Historical Processes of Exclusion and Power Relations in Asian Immigration to British Columbia

2
Pages
APA
Style
~ 2 mins
Reading Time
immigration policy marginalization social exclusion Asian immigrants Canada British Columbia history labor discrimination legislative inequality intersectionality

Conceptual Foundations of Immigration and Its Societal Implications

Immigration The procedure through which individuals become permanent inhabitants of another country is referred to as immigration (Kukathas, 2021). The majority of the Asian communities immigrated to British Columbia and settled there. The immigration of Asian communities resulted in many problems for them and the British government.

Processes Contributing to Systemic Exclusion and Marginalization of Asian Immigrants

What were the processes that created exclusion and marginalization? Marginalization refers to the process of disregarding, downgrading, demeaning, and excluding specific individuals from the benefits of a society. On the other hand, exclusion refers to denying or leaving certain people because of several factors, including race, outside of the benefits, resources, and privileges others enjoy in society or community. One of the processes that created exclusion and marginalization was opposition. When Chinese immigration to what is now British Columbia started in the 1850s, the locals, who were Euro-Canadians, became vocal and persistently opposed to immigration. When South Asians and Japanese immigrants arrived in the early 1900s and 1870s, respectively, this resistance grew more intense. Labor leaders and other individuals in the province effectively advocated for legal and social constraints on Asian jobs, housing, schooling, and civic participation in the province to combat the perceived ethnic and economic hazards posed by these groups. These were the cornerstone for excluding Asians in British Columbia and Canada (Avery, 1995).

Another process of excluding and marginalizing Asian immigrants in British Columbia was through legislation. Unsurprisingly, anti-Asian sentiment in the province quickly became reflected in legislation. For instance, in 1878, it was illegal for Asians to be employed on provincial public projects, and Chinese inhabitants also had to pay an exclusive tax simultaneously (Avery, 1995). The goals of the Dominion administration were not aligned with these efforts to make Asians feel unwanted.

Analysis of Power Relations and Intersectional Dynamics in Immigration Governance

What relations of power and intersectionality were at play? The Dominion authorities had exclusive legislative authority over issues relating to the control of business and trade, foreigners' rights, and Empire-wide treaties under the British North America Act. For this reason, the Dominion governments employed the power of denial against British Columbia on eighteen occasions between 1878 and 1914. In the process, the Dominion government became the guardian of numerous commercial interests, hoping to bring in a sizable Asian population for British Columbia (Avery, 1995).

Sociologist Peter Li claims that Chinese laborers had to overcome challenging occupational obstacles, many of which were put up by authorities in British Columbia in response to political pressure from the province's labor unions. Chinese workers were prohibited from working underground or in skilled roles in mines by the Coal Mines Regulation Act of 1903; however, they were still permitted to work as unskilled laborers above ground. When they turned into small contractors, white workers hired them first despite constant criticisms.

Related Papers
Browse all